If your family office gives money away without a written framework, the first thing to do is build one: a short document that ties your mission to a specific vehicle, a clear decision-making process and a handful of measurable outcomes. That single step, usually led by the family office principal or a designated staff lead, turns scattered generosity into something you can actually steer, review and pass on.
TL;DR:
- Set a fixed percentage, annual sum, or multiyear commitment as the budget rule, then review it every three to five years.
- Choose a donor advised fund to test priorities with lower setup demands; a foundation offers more control but requires ongoing governance and reporting.
- Write policies that define mission, decision rights, investment rules, and conflicts, then give younger relatives a genuine role through a youth forum or advisory process.
- Track outputs, beneficiary outcomes, and system change with mission indicators, pair each number with a qualitative example, and report internally twice yearly.
Marmot Finance
Bring Giving Into Your Financial Plan
Marmot Finance supports women and families in Switzerland with tailored investment management, financial coaching and personal consultations.
Why family offices need a formal philanthropic strategy now
Philanthropy used to sit at the edge of family office work, handled informally and reviewed rarely. That is changing. UBS's Global Family Office research found that across a sample of 307 family offices, many plan strategic asset allocation changes within the next year, a sign that giving is being pulled into the same disciplined planning process as the rest of the balance sheet.
Informal giving carries real costs. Decisions made ad hoc are hard to defend to the next generation, difficult to compare year-on-year and almost impossible to report on with any confidence. A written strategy fixes that by forcing clarity upfront.
A few forces are pushing family offices towards formal structures:
- Intergenerational wealth transfer means younger family members expect a say, and often a different set of priorities.
- Regulatory and public scrutiny of large giving has increased, making documentation and governance more important.
- Families increasingly want evidence that their money changes something, not just a tax receipt.
Setting priorities: defining mission, scope and budget
Before choosing a vehicle, a family needs to agree on what it is actually trying to achieve. That conversation is often harder than the legal work that follows.
- Ask three questions as a family: what problem do we care about, who should benefit, and what does success look like in five years? Write the answers down, even if they are rough.
- Decide the scope: a single country or region, a handful of themes, or a broader mandate. Narrower scope usually means faster, more confident decisions.
- Choose the time horizon: short-term grants that respond to need now, multi-year programmes that build relationships with a few organisations, or a perpetual endowment designed to outlast the current generation.
- Set a budget rule rather than deciding case by case: a fixed percentage of investable assets each year, a flat annual sum, or a rolling multi-year commitment reviewed every three to five years.
Any of those budgeting rules works. What matters is that the family agrees on one and sticks to it long enough to judge whether it is working.
Choosing a vehicle: foundations, funds and impact capital
Once the mission and budget are clear, the next decision is structural: which vehicle actually carries out the giving.
A private foundation gives you the most control and the clearest public identity, but it comes with set-up costs, ongoing governance duties and ongoing reporting obligations that make sense mainly for larger, long-term commitments.
A donor-advised fund is quicker and cheaper to set up, lets you recommend grants without running your own entity, and suits families who want flexibility while they test priorities before committing to something permanent.
Programme-related investments put capital into organisations expecting a below-market return alongside social impact, bridging the gap between grants and ordinary investing. They need active due diligence because they carry real financial risk, not just reputational risk.
Impact investments sit closer to the mainstream portfolio, targeting market or near-market returns while screening for social or environmental outcomes, and tend to fit families who want philanthropy and investing to work together rather than as separate buckets.
A short checklist helps narrow the choice:
- Do we want permanence and a public name, or flexibility to change course quickly?
- Can we commit the time and staff a foundation's governance requires?
- Do we want capital to generate impact and financial return together, or is this money we are prepared to give away outright?
- How much complexity are we willing to manage in exchange for control?
Governance and family engagement: decisions, conflicts and succession
A strategy only works if someone owns the decisions it describes. That means putting a small set of documents in place: a philanthropic policy that states mission, scope and decision rights; investment guidelines for any endowed capital, so it is managed consistently with the family's values and risk tolerance; and a conflict-of-interest policy that covers grants to organisations connected to family members or staff.
On the people side, most families settle on one of a few formats: a steering committee of senior family members who set direction, an advisory board that brings outside expertise, or a youth forum that gives the next generation a genuine role before they inherit full authority. Rotating committee membership every few years keeps the process from calcifying around one person's preferences.
Pro Tip: Build philanthropic roles into the succession plan itself, not as an afterthought, so disputes over money don't spill over into disputes over giving.
Measuring impact without drowning in metrics
Good measurement sits on three tiers. Outputs count activity, such as grants made or beneficiaries reached. Outcomes track change in those beneficiaries, like improved school attendance or income gains. System change looks at whether the underlying conditions, such as policy or market structures, have shifted.
Numbers alone rarely tell the full story. The Centre for Philanthropy Studies guidance recommends combining quantitative indicators with qualitative case studies and beneficiary accounts, because social change tends to unfold slowly and unevenly rather than in neat annual increments.
A small set of credible indicators tied directly to your mission, reviewed annually, tends to tell you more than a long list of metrics nobody revisits. Academic guidance favours this pragmatic approach over chasing a perfect measurement system.
- Report internally at least twice a year to the family steering committee.
- Produce a lighter annual summary for external partners and grantees.
- Pair every quantitative indicator with at least one qualitative example.
Aligning philanthropy with the wider investment portfolio
Philanthropic capital does not have to sit apart from the rest of the balance sheet. Mission-aligned investing and programme-related investments act as a bridge, letting endowed assets support the same goals as the grants programme rather than working against them.
In practice that means revisiting liquidity needs (impact investments often lock up capital longer than public markets) and accepting a different risk and return profile for the portion of assets earmarked for mission-aligned strategies.
- Separate philanthropic capital into its own sleeve with its own risk and liquidity rules.
- Review impact allocations on the same cycle as the rest of the portfolio, not as a one-off decision.
- Check local foundation and tax rules before shifting capital into impact structures, since cantonal practice in Switzerland has moved to permit certain impact and entrepreneurial funding models for tax-exempt foundations, and similar flexibility varies elsewhere in Europe.
How we help family offices build and run a philanthropic strategy
We help families and individuals who want to move from informal giving to a structured plan without hiring an entire new team to do it. Our wealth management mandates can incorporate mission-aligned portfolio sleeves alongside your core investments, and financial coaching can help translate family conversations about values into a written framework with real numbers attached.
We use a hybrid model pairing personal advice with digital tools, including a Money Makeover Quiz, so a family can clarify priorities quickly and then work with an adviser to turn that clarity into allocation and measurement decisions. As a wealth manager focused on women and families, we support families working through exactly this kind of planning with educational webinars and a community of clients.
Why governance beats good intentions
Families who give without structure often mean well, but good intentions do not survive a disagreement about which charity gets funded next year. A governance-first approach gives everyone a process to point to instead of a personality to argue with, and that alone prevents most of the friction that derails family giving over time.
It also makes impact easier to see. When objectives, vehicles and metrics are written down, the family can tell, year on year, whether the money is doing what it was meant to do. Start with something small: convene a two-hour family workshop, or ask one staff member to draft the first version of a philanthropic policy before the next family meeting.
Practical next steps with Marmot Finance
If you are ready to turn a family conversation into a working plan, we can help you structure the financial side of it. Our wealth management service can house a mission-aligned investment sleeve, our financial coaching helps families agree on priorities and budget rules, and our educational webinars and community events give the next generation a low-pressure way to get involved.
- Start with our Money Makeover Quiz to clarify your family's financial priorities.
- Book a wealth management consultation to discuss structuring and allocation.
- Review our pricing and plan tiers to find the right level of support.
Explore our wealth management and coaching services to see how we can support your next step.
This article is general information, not a substitute for advice from a qualified financial advisor. Consult a qualified financial professional about your own circumstances before acting on anything here.
FAQ
What are the five T's of philanthropy?
The five T's, often cited in philanthropy education, are time, talent, treasure, ties and testimony, referring to the different resources a family or individual can contribute beyond money. Family offices typically formalise the "treasure" element first, then build structures for the others as engagement grows.
What is a philanthropic strategy?
A philanthropic strategy is a written framework that defines a family's giving mission, the vehicles used to carry it out, who makes decisions, and how results are measured. Family offices that adopt one tend to make faster, more consistent giving decisions and report on outcomes more credibly.
What is the minimum wealth needed for a family office?
There is no single legal threshold, and practice varies widely by region and service model. Families typically consider setting up a dedicated office once they have enough complexity in their financial and philanthropic affairs to justify dedicated governance and staff, though many access similar support through wealth managers rather than running their own office.
Does Mark Zuckerberg have a family office?
Mark Zuckerberg's philanthropic and investment activity is largely organised through the Chan Zuckerberg Initiative, a limited liability company structure rather than a traditional family office or foundation. This structure allows for a mix of grants, investments and advocacy work under one umbrella.
Sources
- UBS global family report 2026 (summary coverage)
- University of Basel / Centre for Philanthropy Studies guidance (sector overview)
.webp)
.jpeg)
.png)
.svg)
